• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Plenary Sessions

 

The programme will be updated.

Day3
April 6, Thursday
11:45am-1:15pm (UTC+3)
Mixed
RUSENGFR
Synchronized translation

Registration

Accreditation for media

Plenary session “Africa in a changing world”
Moderator: Valeriia GORBACHEVA, Head of Multilateral Strategic Project Office, HSE University

More

Key speakers:

Lindiwe SISULU, Minister of Tourism of the Republic of South Africa (2014-2023); Member of the National Executive Committee of the African National Congress

Alexey VASILIEV, Honorary President, Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Jean-Baptiste TIATHIÉ TINE, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Senegal to the Russian Federation

Vladimir SHUBIN, Principal Research Fellow, Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Honorius Causa, University of the Western Cape

Ezzat Saad EL SAYED, Director, Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs

Ahmed Abdullah ZAYED, Director, Bibliotheca Alexandrina (online)

Rasigan MAHARAJH, Chief Director, Institute for Economic Research on Innovation, Tshwane University of Technology (South Africa)

Andrey MASLOV, Director, Centre for African Studies, HSE University

Leonid ISSAEV, Deputy Director, Centre for Stability and Risk Analysis, HSE University

Description:

Humanity is facing an era of great change, a time for the emergence of a new and fairer multipolar world, and a period for overcoming the insane exploitation of the global majority by the first-world billionaire elite. African countries, as nations of the Global South, have perhaps suffered the most historically from the robbery of their lands by their former colonial masters. It is no accident that 31 of the 37 countries with the biggest debt burdens are in Africa. Yet, what actually is Africa after all? Africa is not simply a continent rich in natural resources. Within the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the individual is the core resource and Africa has the largest percentage of young people in the world. At the end of the 20th century and early 21st century, we saw the focus of the world economy move to Asia. Now, nearly one fourth through the 21st century, Africa is becoming the fastest growing continent, not only in terms of demographics, but also economically and politically. At present, the African Union is a significant global player, while certain African states successfully pursue both regional and international objectives. Nevertheless, Africa will likely become more turbulent in this century as its countries continue to undergo modernization and urbanization (sometimes even in the beginning stages), as well as the formation of ethno-political nations and state development. In turn, this requires in-depth conceptualization of the logic and principles of social, political, cultural and economic development in African nations under ever-changing conditions.

With this in mind, close and deep ties are continuing to be built between Russia and African countries, both economically and culturally. It is vital that Russian-African relations have historically been built upon mutual respect of each other’s culture, traditions and interests, as well as the development of stable and equal partnerships and mutually beneficial projects. Although the Russian Federation engaged less with its African partners in the immediate transitional period after the fall of the Soviet Union, we nonetheless can see the reemergence of our partnership today. Through this cooperation, we can best tap each other’s strengths in order to build thriving societies in our countries, while also becoming pillars of a fairer global order.

Day4
April 7, Friday
10am-11:30am (UTC+3)
Format: face-to-face
RUSENG
Synchronized translation

Plenary Session “Science and Business: New Trends”
Moderator: Yaroslav Kuzminov, Academic Supervisor, HSE University

More

Discussants:

  • Stanislav BLIZNYUK, Chairman – Management Board, Tinkoff Bank;
  • Grigory ANDRUSCHAK, Vice Rector, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology;
  • Dmitry DAGAEV, Vice Rector, HSE University;
  • Alexander POVALKO, Advisor to the Rector, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology;
  • Evgeniy TERENTEV, Director, Institute of Education, HSE University.

Description:

What is the STEM concept of education? It’s an approach, whereby students focus on studying the disciplines which are based on applied analysis and empirical testing of various hypotheses. Nevertheless, this approach doesn’t only concern “verifiable” science, but also the possibility of expanding critical thinking skills, the ability to work with Big Data and preparing learners to face practical problems and business objectives in their pursuits after university.

Issues for discussion:

  • A scientific approach to business
  • How can a “business-applied science-fundamental science” chain be developed?
  • Does Russia need STEM universities and what the future have in store for academic institutions?

11:45am-1:15pm (UTC+3)
Mixed
RUSENG
Synchronized translation

Registration

Accreditation for media

Plenary session “BRICS Development Strategy: Equal Opportunities in an Unequal World”
Moderator: Victoria PANOVA, Vice Rector, HSE University

More

Welcoming address: Nikita ANISIMOV, Rector, HSE University

Key Speakers:

Sergei RYABKOV, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Russian Sherpa in BRICS (online)

Anil SOOKLAL, South African Sherpa in BRICS

Pavel KNYAZEV, Ambassador-at-Large of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Russian Sou-Sherpa in BRICS

Rodrigo De Lima BAENA SOARES, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Federative Republic of Brazil to the Russian Federation

Nandan UNNIKRISHNAN, Distinguished Fellow, Observer Research Foundation (India)

WANG Wen, Executive Dean and Professor of Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies (RDCY), Deputy Dean of Silk Road School, Renmin University of China

Rasigan MAHARAJH, Chief Director of the Institute for Economic Research on Innovation, Tshwane University of Technology (South Africa)

Description:

The failure and turbulence of the global order primarily led in the interest of the global West further highlight the significant role of multilateral global institutions. A dozen of countries have expressed interest in joining the BRICS, including several major regional players. Iran, Argentina and Algeria have already applied officially for BRICS membership. The expansion of this grouping would bring together and harness the potential of regional leaders, while also identifying new solutions to pressing issues. For instance, developing countries have been shortchanged out of USD 4.3 trillion for UN sustainable development goals, owing to the unfair distribution of wealth in the global economy. In addition, since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, global food security has become more of a major issue, accompanied by rising food prices. The breakdown in global supply chains last year, as well as natural disasters, means that 43 states now face major wheat shortages. In light of all of this, the expansion of the BRICS is important for giving a greater voice to developing countries in international trade, financial and monetary institutions and food organizations, in order to contribute to the overall wellbeing. Furthermore, unity, stability and transparency must be guaranteed when conceiving consensus-based decisions, which will be put into practice.

Questions for discussion:

  • How could the BRICS+ countries deal with global challenges in this new reality and what risks must be considered as if BRICS expands?
  • What instruments and formats could encourage greater global stability?
  • How can BRICS+ countries’ contributions to existing multilateral institutions help to further develop its extensive partnership?
2:30pm-4pm (UTC+3)
Mixed
RUSENG
Synchronized translation

Registration

Accreditation for media

Plenary Session “The Global Majority and the New International Order”
Moderator: Sergey KARAGANOV, Academic Supervisor of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, HSE University

More

Key Speakers:

Dmitry TRENIN, Research Professor at the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, HSE University

Bal Krishan SHARMA, Major General (Ret.), Director, United Service Institution of India

Anastasia LIKHACHEVA, Dean, Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, HSE University

WANG Wen, Executive Dean and Professor of Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies (RDCY), Deputy Dean of Silk Road School, Renmin University of China

Rasigan MAHARAJH, Chief Director of the Institute for Economic Research on Innovation, Tshwane University of Technology (South Africa)

Radhika DESAI, Professor, Department of Political Studies, Director, Geopolitical Economy Research Group, University of Manitoba (Canada)

Rakhim OSHAKBAYEV, Director, TALAP Center for Applied Research (Kazakhstan)

Description:

The emergence of a new global order has passed the point of no return, now critically involving states, which are on the sidelines of the conflict between Russia and the West (or China and the US) and eager to maintain their flexibility and ability to build ties with all major powers, with a particular view to their own interests and national development goals. The global majority is not a group of states bound by common interests or acting as a formal alliance, but rather a structural phenomenon in the international political order and economy, setting the stage for current changes: the takedown of the West’s economic, military and technological monopoly, the creation of a multipolar world, stronger regional partnerships and cooperation, thus replacing the previous globalization model.

For Russia, the interests and possibilities of the new global majority means the collapse of the West’s attempts to isolate Moscow in the international arena, an opportunity to further ties with the world’s leading economies and emerging markets, and the creation of new partnerships during a direct clash with the West. For countries in the global majority, Russia is a favourable economic partner, as well as a source of technology and political influence in the global arena. Now, the global majority, including Russia, must determine the key features of a new and fairer international order, maintain and reform global institutions, rules and norms, and enhance globalization processes and transnational connections.

A discussion of these and other issues at this plenary session will allow its participants and the academic community to develop a far more concise understanding of the global majority concept, the characteristics of the new international order and its integral institutions, while also building better regional and international ties, which can remain stable when faced with the aftershocks of conflicts between major powers.

Day5
April 10, Monday
4:15pm-5:45pm (UTC+3)
Format: face-to-face
RUSENG
Synchronized translation

Plenary Session “Info-hygiene and Information Elitism: How to Consume Media Properly”
Moderator: Gleb Cherkasov (HSE University)

More

Key speakers:

Darya LEVCHENKO, Advisor to the Minister of the Economic Development of the Russian Federation

Andrey LAVROV, Senior Director for Communications, HSE University

Anastasia KAZUN, Senior Research Fellow, Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology, HSE University

Ksenia ACHKASOVA, Executive Director, Mediascope

Ivan MAKAROV, Head, Media Working Group, “News on Dzen” Project

Maxim IVANOV, Deputy Head Editor, Vedomosti Newspaper

Description:

In recent years, the quantity of content produced per capita has exploded. This largely happened thanks to new technologies, which have been made accessible to various segments of society throughout the entire world: cheap smartphones and cloud services makes this all possible. Bloggers are now real competitors with mainstream media, since this content is often regarded as less partisan and a reaction to recent public demand for more media integrity. Furthermore, over the last year, the Russian professional media sphere has noticeably grown thinner, resulting in the further appearance of alternative sources of information, including such phenomenon as war-bloggers, whose audiences are comparable to those of mainstream outlets.

However, the constant, uncontrolled flow of terabytes of new information does not present us with a solution to such issues as “information elitism”. In fact, it has only exacerbated it. Lifestyle and culinary blogs often overshadow essential issues, e.g., important political or social decisions or changes, even if the elite is ready to show this. The issue of “information elitism” is, in fact, a general global trend, which has been growing during times of political disunity among world elites, and this trend will only continue to intensify under the guise of concerns for public safety.

Nevertheless, it is impossible to completely hide from the new information space; one can only limit consumption of media. Still, such developments as less TVs in homes could expand into a wider trend overall.

Issues for discussion:

  • Are media outlets losing their audience?
  • Is this a good time for building one’s own media or is curating a Telegram channel really worth it now?
  • What media outlets vet their information and try to fight fake news? Can individual bloggers maintain such a high level of information quality?
  • Is information elitism myth or reality? Should you express your worries publically or is this unsafe?
Day6
April 11, Tuesday
10am-11:30am (UTC+3)
Format: face-to-face
RUSENG
Synchronous translation

Plenary Session “Analysis of Critical Areas of Import Substitution for Russian Agriculture: Development Scenarios”

Opening remarks: Yaroslav Kuzminov, Academic Supervisor, HSE University

Speaker: Ali Uzdenov, CEO, AO Agroholding “Steppe”

Topic: “Prospects for developing dairy farming and crop production in Russia”

Moderator: Nadezhda Orlova, Head, Institute for Agrarian Studies, Department for Economics of Innovation in Agriculture, HSE Univeristy

More

Key speakers:

Vitaly VOLOSCHENKO, Director, Centre for Selection and Initial Seed Breeding GK “EkoNiva”

Nikolai ELATKIN, Head, Genetics Laboratory, APK, “Miratorg”

Semen ZHAVORONKOV, Executive Director, Association of Veterinary Pharmaceutical Production (AVFARM)

Salis KARAKOTOV, General Director, AO “Schelkovo Agrokhim”, RAS Academic, Doctor of Chemical Sciences

Roman KULIKOV, Director, Centre for Developing Genetic Technologies “Innopraktika”

Mikhail KUZYK, Deputy Director, Centre for Industrial Policy Studies, HSE University

Description:

In recent years, Russia has had an impressive track record in improving its national food security, while also enhancing its food sovereignty. State support of the agrarian sector, integration with the global economy and international food systems, and inclusion within the international division of labour have allowed Russia to become a leading agricultural power and a top exporter of foodstuff materials. Nevertheless, accomplishing these goals was possible and supported over a long period only with a view to end agriculture products and was not ensured by respective improvement in terms of production capacity and tools and a system to support import substitution at all points in the production chain.

Over the last 30 years, Russia’s industrial agrarian sector has almost entirely moved to reliance on foreign production technologies. In its acquisition at world prices of planting materials, breeding stock, feed additives and other production means, Russian agriculture has become limited in its options for ensuring a cost advantage for end products on external markets.

The events of recent months have only made these issues more pressing. Unprecedented economic pressures and ever increasing restrictive measures have resulted in dependency on foreign technologies, thus posing a threat not only to what has been achieved but also to ensuring the food security of Russia.

This roundtable discussion will consider the most critical areas for further import substitution in agriculture and determine which sectors are most technologically and economically vulnerable, as well as focus on necessary support measures.

Questions for discussion:

  • Prospects for the development of the Russian agrarian sector
  • Current approaches to genetics and selection
  • Necessary state support for production technologies in the agrarian sector
  • Prospects for the Russian and global fertilizer markets under current conditions
  • Biosecurity – the veterinary medicine market
  • Agricultural machine-building and engineering
  • Support measures and actions to be taken by agro-business under sanction pressures
  • Proposals to amend current legislation

11:45am-1:15pm (UTC+3)
Mixed
RUSENG
Synchronized translation

Registration

Accreditation for media

Plenary Session “EAEU in the New Global Context: Opportunities for the Greater Eurasian Partnership”
Moderator: Victoria PANOVA, Vice Rector, HSE University

More

Key Speakers:

Dmitry VOLVACH, Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation

Marat BERDYEV, Ambassador-at-Large for the Greater Eurasian Partnership of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Russian Sou-Sherpa in G20

Stanislav GEORGIEVSKIY, Vice President, Russian Export Center

Hamza Ali MALIK, Director, Macroeconomic Policy and Financing for Development Division, United Nations ESCAP

Timofei BORDACHEV, Academic Supervisor, Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies, HSE University

Nelson WONG, Vice Chairman, Shanghai Centre for RimPac and International Studies (China)

Kiyoshi YAMADA, Previous Chancellor, Tokai University; Member of the Board of Trustees for International Affairs, Tokai University Educational System (Japan) (online)

Kubatbek RAKHIMOV, Executive Director of the Applicata – Center for Strategic Solutions Public Foundation (Kyrgyzstan)

Sunjoy JOSHI, Chairman, Observer Research Foundation (India) (online)

Glenn DIESEN, Professor, School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway (online)

Description:

The most fundamental challenge currently facing Eurasian economic integration under the EAEU and its institutions is that the union was formed as an instrument to enhance the international competitiveness of its member states, with a reliance on the key institutions and rules of the global order, which itself was based on general openness and globalization. Now, the fundamentals of international economic cooperation are changing: the global economy, while remaining interconnected, is becoming more regionally or macroregionally focused. New centres of gravity are emerging in international trade, investment partnerships, technological transfer and the financial sector. Furthermore, the current course is pushing towards the use of national currencies in bilateral trade.

The world is changing rapidly and the EAEU, as well as the entire Eurasian space, must face these new challenges, while taking advantage of new opportunities. Of key importance now are the financial, economic, institutional and logistic possibilities for the development of the EAEU and its common market, building ties between the EAEU and other Greater Eurasia states, and the creation of logistics systems, which are resistant to external shocks. Previously, partnership within the EAEU and the Greater Eurasia was considered an alternative route. Now, it is a centre where member states can better combat the destructive trends in the global economy, expand trade with outside partners, and gain access to technology and financial markets. With this in mind, the concept of the development of the Greater Eurasian partnership is even more crucial and becoming an EAEU member now is not simply a choice, it is a basic necessity.

The key issues for our Plenary Session include the EAEU’s ability to resist shocks driven by the conflict between Russia and the West, the creation of a system for economic cooperation with non-EAEU states involving the EAEU and its existing institutions, and the formation of a zone of trust and mutual economic transparency in Eurasia in the context of an unstable global economy. This session aims to assess the impact of recent global changes on the development of the EAEU and the Greater Eurasian Partnership and discuss potential political risks, the success of the EAEU and other Eurasian institutions in adapting to new international realities, and ideas for furthering partnerships between Eurasian states in dealing with pressing national development issues.

4:15pm-5:45pm (UTC+3)
In-person

Plenary session “Education: a private or public good? Schooling as the primary chord in contemporary education”
Presentation of HSE University paper

Moderator: Dmitry Zemtsov, Vice Rector, HSE University

More

Description:

Contemporary education is experiencing a crisis at all levels, driven by the lack of alignment with the demands of students. The situation is exacerbated by a vacuum of values and instrumentalization of higher education, whereby methods, indicators and objectives of academic processes remain hermetically sealed and often unclear for stakeholders, such as students themselves, their parents and the business community at large.

One of the key demands of school-aged children and university students concerns project work, which would guarantee the development of applicable skills for today’s workplace. This demand coincides with that of employers, who want today’s graduates to be proactive, socially oriented and in possession of highly practical skills. All of these points coalesce within the higher education system and can be integrated with new learning technologies into a “service learning” approach.

On December 22, 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a session of the State Council of the Russian Federation, concerning contemporary youth policy. According to p. 8 of a list of instructions approved by the President upon the conclusion of this meeting, the Russian Ministry of Education, together with the Ministry of Labour, the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs, and the Association of Volunteer Centres, shall develop and include this “service learning” approach in programmes of higher education (as a module). Today, universities must focus on applying this approach through a designated educational mechanism, as well as create environments where students can realize their patriotic potential while their long-term partnership with NGOs can be developed.

Key questions:

  • Is the “service learning” approach a new vector in the development of higher education and can it serve as a foundation for devising new values in it?
  • What has already been done? Some successful case studies in the application of “service learning” technologies in Russia
  • “Service learning” and the volunteer movement: variations between these concepts, and prospects for cooperation and development
  • How can this approach impact student performance?
  • Society and community: who should universities partner together in the application of “service learning” mechanism?
  • Instruments for integrating “service learning” in educational processes.
6 pm-7:30 pm (UTC+3)
In-person

Plenary session “Evidence-based youth policy: prospects for development and potential for application in the Russian context”
Moderator: Dmitry Zemtsov, Vice Rector, HSE University

More

Description:

State administration in today’s world is closely aligned with how expert and academic knowledge is used in regards to political decision-making, and youth policy is no exception.

How can expert analysis be integrated with political processes? One possible answer is the principle of “provability”.

An “evidence-based” policy relies on foundation data generated through analysis, both quantitative and qualitative. Analytical conclusions form the basis for effective political projects: support programmes, national and federal projects, and legislative acts, as well as predictive metrics.

Contemporary Russia has witnessed the development of a wide range of institutions, which collect, aggregate and analyze various arrays of data with respect to the implementation of youth policy, e.g., quantity of promising and motivated young people, effectiveness of youth programmes, total number of youth organizations, etc.

Nevertheless, a key problem demanding attention concerns the development of a unified and seamless ecosystem, which can facilitate all stakeholders in youth policy to apply such data in real-life solutions.

This session will consider the prospects for applying an “evidence-based” approach for youth policy, as well as the options for creating consortiums, which can form a unified space of accessible and detailed data to be used by a wide specter of organizational stakeholders in the development of youth policy.

Key questions:

  • What are the successful practices in the application of research outcomes in the provision of youth policy?
  • What areas of youth policy specifically require data proven to be valid: patriotic education, identifying and encouraging youth, fighting problems faced by youth, etc.?
  • How can infrastructure for data-based youth policy be organized: should this be a unified federal analytical centre, or a more effectively distributed system of analytical centres, operating out of various organizations/institutions?
  • What are the prospects for applying a wide spectrum of data in youth policy: federal surveys, digital footprints, Big Data? What needs to be done to bring together such aggregated data?
  • What administrative and technical solutions could be used to coordinate the activities of various organizations and platforms involved in the realization of youth policy (in order to avert duplication and inaccuracies in collected and aggregated data)?
Day7
April 12, Wednesday
10am-11:30am (UTC+3)
In-person

Plenary session “Support for youth in Russia: the experience of the law ‘On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation’”
Moderator: Dmitry Zemtsov, Vice Rector, HSE University

More

Description:

The relevance of the new legislation is conditioned by the need for a federal legal definition of the goals, principles, key areas and formats for carrying out youth policy.

This situation creates barriers for developing uniform support for youth and the legislation under discussion aims to reduce these barriers. Discussion around the new law also requires consideration of the youth policy model currently being developed in the Russian Federation, including an analysis of the models applied in Europe and Asia, as well as considering options for applying elements of such models in Russia.

The new law “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation” aims to enact a unified youth policy model and devise a federal list of measures to support young people in Russia.

This session will discuss the problems and barriers to developing measures to assist youth in regions of the Russian Federation, regional experiences in supporting youth and developing the youth policy model, which is enacted thanks to the law “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation”.

Key questions:

  • What is the model for youth policy put forth in the draft law “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation”?
  • What measures are specified in the draft law “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation”?
  • What are the reasons and consequences of regional differences in the implementation of Russian youth policy?
  • What specific support measures for special groups of youth and innovative measures to support them are now being pursued in Russia’s federal subjects and what is their practical experience?
  • What youth policy models have been developed in other countries?
  • What international measures to support youth could be implemented in Russia?
11:45am-1:15pm (UTC+3)
Mixed

Plenary session “Graduates of vocational schools on the Russian job market”
Presentation of HSE University paper

Moderator: Liliya Ovcharova, Vice Rector, HSE University

More

Persons with vocational education are the largest category of workers on the Russian labour market, counting for around 45% of total employed individuals. Graduates of technical schools, colleges and professional institutes are the foundational workforce in all sectors of the Russian economy – machine-building, metallurgy, energy, resource production, transport, communication, services, IT, as well as in the social sphere – in education, health care, culture and the arts.

The demand for a highly qualified, contemporary workforce has become more pressing. The further popularization of digital technologies speeds up the pace of transformation and, as a result, new professions and entire sectors are emerging. It is evident that recent graduates are in possession of modern skills and qualifications. They should be best prepared for working with hi-tech equipment and be extremely flexible and mobile in crises or when production processes are overhauled.

This plenary session will consider the position of graduates of Russian colleges on the job market and how effectively the vocational educational system can transform in order to meet the realities of today’s economy. In addition, we investigate the key issues facing vocational graduates when trying to find work, their wage rates, how work and education can be mixed, interregional mobility and gender differences on the market, as well as which measures the state should undertake to effectively prepare workers with vocational education.