We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Honorary Speakers

 Sergey Dubinin

Moscow State University

Sergey Dubinin

International Monetary System Evolution as External Determinant for Russian Economy

The fragmentation of the global economy is not purely an economic process. On the contrary, its primary driver is geopolitical confrontation and decoupling, which now appears to encompass the entire multipolar world. To fully understand this phenomenon, it is essential to examine all underlying root causes. Fragmentation represents a contemporary phase of economic globalization, in which national defense and security concerns take precedence in international relations. The past five years (2020–2025) have been marked by efforts to find new strategies and tools for balancing national security objectives with economic development goals. As IMF First Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath has noted, “Policymakers are increasingly… focused on building economic resilience.” Financial market fragmentation may significantly impact macroeconomic trends at both national and global levels. In this context, our study analyzes the financial aspects of emerging geopolitical blocs, specifically the US-centric and China-centric blocs. However, most developing countries prefer to maintain friendly relations with both. This evolving financial landscape underscores the deep interconnection between geopolitics and global economic trends, shaping the future of international markets. The current trend of global financial fragmentation is shaped by several key factors:

• The rising economic weight of emerging markets: These nations are gaining real economic influence and power, playing an increasingly significant role in shaping global capital flows. China has been the most prominent player in this process.

• Financial markets outpacing industrial goods and commodities: A major trend in the financial sector has been the rapid accumulation of national debt (both public and private) denominated in foreign currencies. Financial “bubbles” based on foreign assets have expanded to volumes exceeding global GDP.

• The US dollar’s shifting role: Although the USD’s share in cross-border trade finance payments has declined since 2022, it remains dominant in the foreign exchange market, investment securities, gold and FX reserves, and FDI deal flows.

• The increasing use of politically motivated sanctions: Emerging market economies face growing sanction pressures, predominantly from the United States and its allies. A widening circle of nations is now concerned about the risk of being subjected to such measures.

• Efforts to establish financial resilience: Many countries are working to create a “safety net” against sanctions, particularly by securing alternative channels for international payments. These efforts include structural changes to the global payments system, the adoption of technical innovations, and the introduction of new financial instruments. A key trend in this shift is the gradual increase in the use of non-traditional national currencies for botthe h bilateral and multilateral transactions.

• National finance system of the Russian Federation was subjected to economic sanctions challenges in 2014 – 2025. The international sanctions pressure was introduced by the unfriendly countries authorities. Russian financial institutions have successfully adapted to the crisis environment. The banking sector maintains stable and efficient operations. The finance system sustainability mainly is a result of the banking sector coordination under the Government and Central Bank supervision and regulation.

Time and date of presentation: April 16, 2025 at 12:00 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Face-to-face


 Irina Karelina

HSE University

Irina Karelina

Boosting the Competitiveness of Russian Higher Education: Key Factors and Tools

1. Boosting the global competitiveness of Russian higher education has been a strategic priority for Russia’s political leadership. It has also been of significant professional interest among Russian universities seeking to strengthen their position in the international education and research market. This priority has been consistently reaffirmed through national goals and target indicators outlined in several key presidential decrees. The 2012 decree set the objective of having at least five Russian universities ranked among the world's top 100 universities in globally recognized rankings by 2020. The 2018 decree aimed to position Russia among the world’s top 10 countries in terms of general education and sought to double the number of international students enrolled in Russian universities and research institutions. The 2024 decree further reinforced this goal, targeting at least 500,000 international students at Russian universities by 2030.The implementation of comprehensive measures to achieve these objectives has resulted in significant progress in Russian higher education. Currently, approximately 390,000 international students are enrolled in Russian universities, and 105 Russian institutions are featured in global rankings, with 20 of them listed among the top 100 in their respective subject-based rankings. Additionally, HSE University is ranked among the top 100 institutions in the global rankings of young universities. In early 2025, the Russian government approved the Unified Plan for Achieving National Development Goals through 2030 and for the Future Until 2036, which outlines key factors and tools for attaining the country’s higher education targets in the coming years. 
2. The global academic mobility landscape reflects an intensifying competition for academic talent, with many countries actively developing new strategies to attract international students and young researchers. A growing number of young scholars are showing a preference for studying in the Asia-Pacific region. Countries such as South Korea, Japan, and China have refined their international student recruitment policies—adjusting for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic—to meet ambitious enrollment targets: 300,000, 380,000, and 500,000 students, respectively, by 2030.China remains the largest provider of English-language degree programs for students from non-English-speaking countries and continues to expand this niche, particularly at the graduate and postgraduate (master’s and doctoral) levels. While the United Kingdom and Australia have traditionally been among the top destinations for Chinese students, a noticeable decline in their enrollment was already evident in the 2023 academic year. 
3. Universities worldwide have accumulated significant experience in implementing diverse strategies to recruit international students. These strategies include offering a wide range of educational programs across different degree levels, academic mobility initiatives (ranging from short-term ‘educational tourism to full-cycle degree programs with practical training and skills development), language and cultural immersion programs, network-based and double degree programs, and the establishment of academic hubs designed to attract and integrate international students. Other approaches include active participation in academic exhibitions and industry-specific trade fairs, along with offering immigration and social benefits to international students.
4. One of the most effective tools for recruiting highly motivated and talented students is the organization of academic contests and grant programs. These initiatives offer winners not only tuition-free education in their chosen field but also the opportunity to acquire language proficiency through full immersion in the host country, along with access to various social benefits throughout their studies.This presentation offers a case study on the Open Doors: Russian Scholarship Project—an international academic competition that serves as one of Russia’s most extensive and impactful talent recruitment initiatives. Each year, this project attracts over 146,000 participants from more than 190 countries. The case study explores participants’ preferences in selecting degree programs and universities, as well as broader trends shaping global academic mobility under current conditions.

Time and date of presentation: April 16, 2025 at 14:30 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Face-to-face


 David Xianglin Li

Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance (SAIF), Shanghai Jiao Tong University

David Xianglin Li

Credit Portfolio Valuation: Risk Neutral, or Something Else?

We will first give an overview of credit portfolio modelling and compare two approaches: the academic approach using correlated stochastic hazard rates, and the industry approach using copula functions. We will then highlight a major drawback in the current copula function approach. Finally, we will examine some potential solutions to the risk measure changes for credit portfolio risks driven by correlated stochastic processes.

Time and date of presentation: April 17, 2025 at 14:30 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Face-to-face


 Eric Maskin

Harvard University, HSE University

Eric Maskin

Markov Equilibrium

In dynamic games, a Markov equilibrium entails strategies that, roughly speaking, depend on “as little about the past as possible.” In this paper, we formalize this idea of minimal dependence. In previous work, we focused on complete information. Here we concentrate on games of incomplete information, and show that existence of Markov equilibrium there can be problematic. Accordingly, we propose a relaxation of the Markov concept that ensures existence but that still retains its spirit.

Time and date of presentation: April 15, 2025 at 16:30 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Online


 Santosh Mehrotra

University of Bath

Santosh Mehrotra

Narratives Versus Reality on Employment and Demography: How Undermining Institutions Can Push Countries Out of the ‘Narrow Corridor’

Demographic dividends in the lives of nations come but once in their entire history. Either a country succeeds in riding the wave of that dividend during a period of economic transformation by generating millions of jobs for its youth, who can then enter the labour market, or, if it misses the wave, the dividend is wasted. The latter can have very adverse consequences for nations, which this paper discusses briefly. Drawing upon the empirical realities of several major countries (e.g. India, and to a lesser extent Brazil, South Africa, China, and potentially the United Kingdom), we argue that if national governments fail to provide decent livelihoods for their citizens by fostering job creation and other transformations, they end up using their power to build a ‘grand narrative’ about citizens’ rights to work and a decent life, while becoming more authoritarian in order to control such a narrative. In this way, countries risk squandering their demographic dividends, while using institutions to build an illusionary narrative about ‘economic growth’ and ‘jobs’ in an effort to ‘sell’ their citizens on the idea that the government is actively working to achieve ambitious goals for the citizenry. In this paper, we plan to use the conceptual framework of the ‘narrow corridor,’ as defined by Acemoglu and Robinson. When faced with pressures from the citizenry, or from the need to remain in power, governments often 'capture institutions' without due regard for the creation of jobs or the consequences of ignoring demographic trends, whether the population is already aging or is relatively young, which may have damaging consequences for all. Achieving a balance between state power and the rights of citizens is critical for countries that are on the path toward achieving ‘positive’ goals for their citizens that promise economic growth and equality. This ‘narrow corridor’ is always a difficult path for nations to tread, yet essential for ensuring that citizens’ rights to decent livelihoods are realized, while simultaneously helping the ‘nation’ achieve its goal of boosting per capita income. Whether that path is one that ensures that state institutions strengthen the goals of both growth and decent jobs, or merely gives the semblance of achieving growth at the expense of livelihoods, may depend on whether the institutions of the state remain within the ‘narrow corridor’ or not. The paper maps out this tension, both empirically (based on data from countries across the globe) and theoretically, in the context of employment and demographic trends.

Time and date of presentation: April 15, 2025 at 14:30 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Face-to-face


 Panos Pardalos

HSE University – Nizhny Novgorod, University of Florida

Panos Pardalos

Impact of AI on the Economics of Sustainability

The transformative impact of AI on the economics of sustainability lies in its ability to optimize resource use, reduce waste, and drive innovation, thus fundamentally aligning economic systems with sustainable practices. By leveraging predictive analytics and intelligent automation, AI enhances renewable energy integration, streamlines agriculture, and advances circular economy models, such as precision recycling. It also accelerates the adoption of green technologies, such as electric vehicles and smart cities, enabling governments and businesses to achieve sustainability goals while fostering economic growth. Ultimately, AI harmonizes economic progress with environmental stewardship, positioning itself as a key enabler of sustainable and resilient economies.

Time and date of presentation: April 18, 2025 at 12:00 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Face-to-face


 Alexander Smirnov

HSE University

Alexander Smirnov

The Macrofinancial Oscillator: Dynamics of Money and Debt

The financial crises of 2008 and 2020, coupled with unprecedented issuance of global liquidity and the massive growth of digital platforms, have led to heightened interest in understanding the nature of money and debt and their interaction in the modern economy. The exploration of these economic processes can be traced back to the 15th century, and is firmly grounded in the works of Luca Pacioli, Georg Friedrich Knapp, Alfred Mitchell-Innes, Irving Fisher, John Maynard Keynes, John Kenneth Galbraith, James Tobin, and David Graeber, among many others. This report delves into the contemporary phase of global financialization via employing a model featuring a harmonic oscillator with forced and damped oscillations. The analysis reveals that macrofinancial dynamics follow a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE), elucidating actions by rational creditors who are usually offsetting anticipated losses stemming from rising debts. The interplay between money and debt generates oscillations and rotations in these indicators, modifies amplitudes and phases of the associated system states, and accounts for diverse characteristics of the macrofinancial cycle. New money creation, which is formally akin to an instantaneous impulse or a Dirac delta function, serves as the driver of a macrofinancial oscillator. The system’s response to monetary interventions might help discern the emergence of critical events, such as resonance or financial crises. The model presented successfully simulated the global debt reaction to the monetary shock during the COVID-19 pandemic. Debt cycles validate the hypothesis that stable prototypes of ‘imaginary’ or ‘virtual’ money did exist in the past, albeit in varying technical forms. Unravelling the intricacies of money and debt cycles permits the adoption of more robust approaches to addressing challenges stemming from monetary and macroprudential policies.

Time and date of presentation: April 16, 2025 at 16:30 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Face-to-face


 Archana Upadhyay

Jawaharlal Nehru University

Archana Upadhyay

India’s Civilizational 'Exceptionalism' in a Multipolar World

The emergence of a multipolar world order since the 1990s has enhanced the importance of the civilizational discourse in international relations. Although ‘civilization’ as a unit of analysis is highly contested, its significance lies in its frequent usage in cultural and political debates. The discourse on civilization is attributable to three distinct developments in global affairs: the crisis of the Western liberal establishment; the rise of identity politics and populism; and the economic and political rise of Asian nations, such as India and China, with large populations and historically independent cultures and civilizations. The construction of civilizational identities is a multi-layered process that involves competing frameworks of political, cultural, social and ethnic affiliations. This paper will focus on how conceptualizations of civilization have an impact on political practices, identities and patterns of social interactions among states, resulting in specific foreign policy outlooks. It will explore the motivations for countries to put forward claims of civilizational ‘exceptionalism’ for a more assertive engagement in international affairs, while simultaneously challenging established global hierarchies.

Time and date of presentation: April 17, 2025 at 12:00 (UTC+3)

Format of presentation: Online


 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!